<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Podcasting Ever Be Huge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/</link>
	<description>AP&#039;s thoughts and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:13:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Walch</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Walch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff - iTunes is definitely the default client for Podcasts.  It has been since June 2005.  I think the bigger difference in Podcats vs Twitter (140 characters)  and Youtube (Most videos &lt;3 Mins) is that Podcasts run 30 to 60 minutes on average.  It is really the difference between finding time for a full meal - vs grabbing a quick snack.  One other big difference between Podcasts and Twitter - is the audience - in Twitter - you may have 10,000 or more followers - but &quot;followers&quot; is at best a shaky term.  If you have 10,000 listeners with a podcast - you have a very loyal and engaged &quot;audience&quot;.  From that perspective monetizing your audience as a Podcaster is much more likely than say for someone on Twitter.  Read this post for more on engagement of Twitter followers - &lt;a href=&quot;http://podcast411.libsyn.com/webpage/twitter-followers-vs-podcast-listeners-&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://podcast411.libsyn.com/w...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rob Walch&lt;br&gt;Host - podCast411 and Today in iOS Podcasts &lt;br&gt;VP Podcaster Relations Libsyn&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; iTunes is definitely the default client for Podcasts.  It has been since June 2005.  I think the bigger difference in Podcats vs Twitter (140 characters)  and Youtube (Most videos &lt;3 Mins) is that Podcasts run 30 to 60 minutes on average.  It is really the difference between finding time for a full meal &#8211; vs grabbing a quick snack.  One other big difference between Podcasts and Twitter &#8211; is the audience &#8211; in Twitter &#8211; you may have 10,000 or more followers &#8211; but &#8220;followers&#8221; is at best a shaky term.  If you have 10,000 listeners with a podcast &#8211; you have a very loyal and engaged &#8220;audience&#8221;.  From that perspective monetizing your audience as a Podcaster is much more likely than say for someone on Twitter.  Read this post for more on engagement of Twitter followers - <a href="http://podcast411.libsyn.com/webpage/twitter-followers-vs-podcast-listeners-" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://podcast411.libsyn.com/w.." rel="nofollow">http://podcast411.libsyn.com/w..</a>.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob Walch<br />Host &#8211; podCast411 and Today in iOS Podcasts <br />VP Podcaster Relations Libsyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jenkins</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think consumability is definitely a significant factor.  There is no default client for podcasts in the way that twitter is one for links, or YouTube is for video.  I assume there are companies who are trying to do that, although none have got so big that I (a very light podcast consumer) have heard of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think consumability is definitely a significant factor.  There is no default client for podcasts in the way that twitter is one for links, or YouTube is for video.  I assume there are companies who are trying to do that, although none have got so big that I (a very light podcast consumer) have heard of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda peyton</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda peyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, Twitter and RSS were tackling the same problem from completely different angles, and one was much more easy to consume than the other. The idea of &quot;consumability&quot; is perhaps an issue with podcasts that you touched on. Maybe the real question is how to make audio more consumable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Twitter and RSS were tackling the same problem from completely different angles, and one was much more easy to consume than the other. The idea of &#8220;consumability&#8221; is perhaps an issue with podcasts that you touched on. Maybe the real question is how to make audio more consumable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda peyton</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda peyton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-266</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s an excellent point - though why has video been able to overcome some of the problems that podcasting has run into?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s an excellent point &#8211; though why has video been able to overcome some of the problems that podcasting has run into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Inside every podcast, video, and webcast is a short text summary waiting to get out.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside every podcast, video, and webcast is a short text summary waiting to get out.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jenkins</title>
		<link>https://amandapeyton.com/blog/2012/04/will-podcasting-ever-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandapeyton.com/blog/?p=493#comment-264</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think a significant difference with Twitter is that it&#039;s bidirectional.  Even if you aren&#039;t posting new content yourself, there is retweeting.  The format also makes it easy to read just a little whenever you have a second to spare.  I&#039;m really into The Economist&#039;s word-for-word podcast, but I find I have trouble paying any attention to it unless I&#039;m doing something mindless (commuting, biking, cooking, etc).  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other problem I have is figuring out which podcasts I might be interested in.  It would be neat if there was a page like you get when you click on an RSS feed which would give a text preview of a bunch of posts from a podcast.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a significant difference with Twitter is that it&#39;s bidirectional.  Even if you aren&#39;t posting new content yourself, there is retweeting.  The format also makes it easy to read just a little whenever you have a second to spare.  I&#39;m really into The Economist&#39;s word-for-word podcast, but I find I have trouble paying any attention to it unless I&#39;m doing something mindless (commuting, biking, cooking, etc).  </p>
<p>The other problem I have is figuring out which podcasts I might be interested in.  It would be neat if there was a page like you get when you click on an RSS feed which would give a text preview of a bunch of posts from a podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
